Heating &
Dry Matter Loss in Maize Silage
Delayed harvest has meant that maize silages are reaching or exceeding 35% DM
Get the latest Free Silage Density Calculator
based on over 160 core samples
Take home Messages
 | Losses due to poor rolling and packing of Maize silage can
exceed £2000 / 100 acres - many of these
losses are invisible and take place before moulding is seen. |
 | The minimum feed out rate in cool weather is 4" per
day, 6" in warm but Clamps should be designed for
a minimum feed out rate of 1ft per day where bulk density is (normally)
inadequate. |
 | As the dry matter of maize
silages rises beyond 28-30% DM so it is more
prone to heating and losses. |
 | DM density - hence loss -
is greatly influenced by the frequency, number & weight of the rolling /
packing
tractor(s) AND THICKNESS OF PACKING LAYERS - MAX 4 INCHES |
 | Careful sheeting of sides
and the top of the clamp with tires touching is essential |
 | A clean feed face and
floor are essential - brush up and feed any fallen silage immediately. |
 |
5kg Urea /t applied between 30-40% DM can help to reduce
heating - and adds protein |
 | Propionic acid at 2-3L
/t costs - £2-3 per ton and can reduce heating. Urea and
propionic acid may be used
together, as may some inoculants and urea. |
 | MaizeCool by Biotal has
received favourable reporting for high DM maize. |
 | Propionic acid to spray
the clamp face or infeed EcoTMR from Ecosyl Products & similar materials
may help if feed out rates are a problem. |
 | There is a good report on
the effectiveness of inoculants from the USDA
Forage Centre |
Dry Matter Loss as
Influenced by Silage Density
This example worked on Lucerne clamp silage - (Ruppel,
1992)
|
Density
|
|
Loss Per
100 acres silage
|
|
Lbs DM/CuFt
|
Kg/CuM
|
%
|
£
|
|
|
10
|
160
|
20.2
|
5656
|
|
|
14
|
224
|
16.8
|
4704
|
|
|
15
|
240
|
15.9
|
4452
|
|
|
16
|
256
|
15.1
|
4228
|
|
|
18
|
288
|
13.4
|
3752
|
|
|
22
|
352
|
10
|
2800
|
|
Maize Silage Density
Recommended minimum
density of 14 lbs DM/ft 225kg/m
Core sample density from 81 maize
clamps (Holmes & Muck 1999)
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range
|
|
Dry
Matter
|
%
|
34
|
|
25
|
-
|
46
|
|
|
Average
Particle size
|
Inch
|
0.43
|
Kg
|
0.28
|
Kg
|
0.68
|
Kg
|
|
Wet
Density
|
Lbs/CuFt
|
43
|
689
|
23
|
368
|
60
|
961
|
|
Dry
Matter Density
|
Lbs/CuFt
|
14.8
|
232
|
7.8
|
125
|
23.6
|
378
|
From
this work most of the variation in silage density was accounted for by packing.
DM loss is greatly
influenced by the frequency, number & weight of the rolling /
packing tractor(s) & depth of packing layer.
Maximum packing layer should be 4".
400 hp self propelled: 100t per hour 35% DM delivered to 9ft clamp
|
9ft
Deep Clamp Loading 100t per hour 35% DM fresh forage
|
|
|
DM Density
|
|
Base
|
14t
|
Loader
tractor 6 inch layer
|
Kg DM/CuM
|
|
Add
|
9t
|
Tractor
50% of time
|
204
|
|
Add
|
9t
|
Tractor
100% of time
|
211
|
|
Add
|
2t
|
Weights
to 14t tractor - do not use 9t tractor
|
208
|
|
Add
|
2t
|
Weights
to both tractors 100% of time
|
226
|
|
Reduce
to
|
4 inch
|
Filling
layer
|
233
|
|
Reduce
to
|
4 inch
|
Filling
layer and use both tractors 100% time
|
251
|
|
Reduce
to
|
4 inch
|
Filling
layer and use both tractors + weights 100% time
|
274
|
Face Management
A minimum feeding rate of 4 inches in winter and 6 inches in summer must be maintained while feeding to minimize dry losses in typical 13lb
DM /cu ft. Clamps
however should be designed to achieve twice these rates as density in UK
clamps is often sub optimal.
Feed Losses
Silage Dry
Matter
|
During Filling
|
Effluent
|
Gas
|
Top Surface
|
At Feeding
|
Total
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
| Clamp - walled (incl earth)
|
|
20
|
2-5
|
4
|
9
|
2*
|
3** -10
|
20-30
|
|
30
|
2-5
|
1
|
7
|
3*
|
3** -10
|
16-23
|
|
40
|
3-6
|
0
|
6
|
4
|
5** -15
|
18-31
|
| Clamp - no walls
|
|
20
|
3-6
|
5*
|
8*
|
2*
|
3** -10
|
21-31
|
|
30
|
3-6
|
0*
|
7*
|
4*
|
3** -10
|
17-27
|
|
40
|
4-7
|
0
|
6
|
6
|
5** -15
|
21-34
|
**Loss at feeding is 3-5% with
good management on concrete floor. Use 4-6% for asphalt, 6-8% for macadam (har
core), and 8-20% with earth floor assuming good face management. With less than
good management, add up to 7% additional
loss.
Loader Buckets versus shear grabs
Using a loader bucket to lift
silage up loosens the whole face, causing cracks to penetrate deep into the
silage - if there isn't a shear grab,
 | Scrape down the face with
the bucket edge
|
 | Shear across the face with
the side of the bucket
|
 | Undermine the face and use
the bucket to scrape silage down onto the floor
|
Whatever is used, the silage
face should remain tight and smooth.
Care should be taken to remove
only that needed for a given feeding. Feed accumulated at the base of the feed
out face will heat before being used in the next feeding.
Using the Silage Density Calculator
Preview the calculator if you
do not have MS Excel Installed - get the free
viewer before downloading the calculator.
Calculations used in the clamp consider:
 | Height of settled silage |
 | Dry Matter % of Fresh material |
 | Tons per hour Fresh Weight delivered to the clamp. |
 | Number & weight of tractors / loaders and time spent
rolling / packing |
 | Thickness of silage spread pre packing. |
Key Factors in determining Dry Matter Density at the clamp are
tractor weight and thoroughness of rolling thin layers.
Twin wheels do not make a lot of difference - the bigger and heavier the
tractors / loaders the better. There would
need to be a fleet of 5ton tractors to make any real contribution to
density. At High delivery rates there needs be two
to heavy weight loader tractors. In earth bank pits - Industrial vibrating
hard core rollers can make a real difference.
|