Inbreeding
Extinction of a breed is the inevitable destination of an inbreeding blind
alley. Some geneticists believe that commercial Holstein farmers
will, like the pig industry, be cross breeding within 10-20 years.
 | The average 5% inbred US cow loses an estimated US$72 -
£45 and 75 days herd life
|
 | Each 1% inbreeding cuts Lifetime Profit (LP)
by 1US$24 - £15, yield by 30Kg a lactation &
survival (PL) by 13 days. Thats for starters before any increased lethal
or debilitating recessive genes (BLAD, Factor X, DUMPS, Bull Dog, Mule
Foot etc) are considered.
|
 | Inbred bulls mated to unrelated cows cancels out previous
inbreeding. BUT the average US cow is already inbred at the 5%
level.
|
 | Despite the UK's relatively late deployment of N.
American genetics, the black and white breed is predominantly Holstein via
one country or another's N. American derived sires. The diversity of the
breed is shrinking at an unprecedented rate. |
ADVICE
 | Set avoidance of inbreeding as a first priority over any
other breeding decision
|
 | Widening selection of breeding companies will help
maintain genetic progress and minimise inbreeding.
|
 | As the UK Holstein herd inevitably becomes more
inbred, mating decisions will have to tolerate a certain level of
inbreeding and any predicted financial loss weighed against genetic
gain.
|
 | Without breeding software, good records going back to the
dam's grand sire are essential to minimise inbreeding below 3% ( Grandson
x Granddaughter ). This is quite easy to do for the 150 cow herd, larger
herds need DIY software eg RedBook
. or an independent mating service such as Selectabull
|
 | Mating software should be set for a maximum inbreeding
level of 3% (derived from a minimum 3 generation pedigree) and selection
of sires should be from all companies. In countries that have been
US derived Holstein for many years - eg Italy, France, Holland, inbreeding
levels are similar to if not higher than the US and Canada. A 3%
inbreeding target will be difficult to achieve
|
 | A breeding companies strategy for sire selection is very
successfully focused by the Animal Model. This model considers
all a sire's recorded relatives in estimating a PTA (Predicted
Transmitting Ability) prior to a 1st Lactation widespread proof. This is
backed up with genetic testing for productive markers and lethal recessive
genes. The Animal Model's weakness, if there is one, is that it
concentrates attention on close relatives thus decreasing diversity.
Diversity is further reduced by concentrating on first crop daughter
tests. Sometimes it is not until the second calving results appear
that we truly know a sire's worth. Several potential sires of sons have
been overlooked in the race for the commercially important first crop
tests.
|
Consequences of Inbreeding in the US Herd
| Relatives
at Mating |
|
Milk1 |
Fat1 |
Pro1 |
SCS2* |
Mor* |
PL2* |
Lifetime
Loss 1 |
| Coefficient
of Inbreeding |
% |
Kg |
Kg |
Kg |
Score |
% |
Days |
$ |
£ |
|
1 |
30 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
24 |
15 |
| Suggested
Maximum Level |
2 |
59 |
2 |
2 |
0.01 |
4 |
26 |
48 |
30 |
| Grandson
x Granddaughter |
3 |
89 |
3 |
3 |
0.01 |
6 |
39 |
72 |
45 |
|
4 |
119 |
4 |
4 |
0.02 |
8 |
52 |
96 |
60 |
| Current
US Inbreeding |
5 |
148 |
5 |
5 |
0.02 |
10 |
66 |
120 |
75 |
| Son
x Granddaughter |
6.25 |
178 |
6 |
6 |
0.02 |
12 |
79 |
144 |
90 |
| Grandson
x Daughter |
7 |
207 |
8 |
7 |
0.03 |
14 |
92 |
168 |
105 |
|
8 |
237 |
9 |
8 |
0.03 |
8 |
105 |
192 |
120 |
|
9 |
267 |
10 |
9 |
0.04 |
18 |
118 |
192 |
135 |
|
10 |
296 |
11 |
10 |
0.04 |
20 |
131 |
216 |
150 |
|
11 |
326 |
12 |
11 |
0.04 |
22 |
144 |
240 |
165 |
| Son
x Daughter |
12.5 |
356 |
13 |
12 |
0.05 |
24 |
157 |
288 |
180 |
| 1/2
brother x 1/2 sister (1/2 sibs) |
13 |
385 |
14 |
13 |
0.05 |
26 |
170 |
312 |
195 |
|
14 |
415 |
15 |
14 |
0.06 |
28 |
183 |
336 |
210 |
|
15 |
445 |
16 |
15 |
0.06 |
30 |
197 |
360 |
225 |
| Sire
x Daughter |
25 |
741 |
27 |
24 |
0.1 |
50 |
328 |
600 |
375 |
| Son
x Mother (Dam) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Brother
x Sister (full sibs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: Surprisingly in Smith et al's
2,600,000 cow study observed a negligible impact on Somatic Cell Score.
Effects on fertility however are more pronounced ie one days loss in calving
interval for every 1% level of inbreeding.
*SCS = Somatic (Mastitis) Cell Score on a range of 0-4
*Mor = is the percentage increase over average expected herd mortality
*PL = Productive Life in days
Advanced Technical Reading
1
Wiggans et al. JDS 78:1584-1590
2
Smith et el. JDS 80 (Suppl. 1):226 (Abstr.)
3
Hansen, L. '99 in proc. WCDS
Extinction is when Montbeillard, Normande, Friesian, Brown Swiss, or Swedish
Red, become sires of Holstein sons. Some workers (3) believe
this will happen within 10-20 years. Cross breeding is an emerging
reality for different reasons in true milk from grass situations. Is it
possible to imagine, rather like the pig industry, nucleus herds maintaining
pure inbred lines which are then cross bred to provide sires or indeed
embryo's to the commercial producer?
Extinction can be delayed by the individual herd owner
focusing on individual matings which as a first priority avoid
inbreeding. This demands independent mating programs which cover a least
3 pedigrees, and limit inbreeding to a maximum 3%
Extinction maybe avoided if the industry as a whole is given
clear messages about what needs to be done and the tools to do the job.
|